Legal Opinion

Dorsett v. Valence Operating Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided August 5, 2003No. 06-02-00141-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice MORRISS.

This is an appeal of the partial summary judgment issued by the 71st Judicial District Court in Harrison County on August 8, 2002, and September 23, 2002. The summary judgment raises issues concerning interpretation of a provision in a joint operating agreement that imposes a non-consent penalty 1 on parties to the agreement who do not timely elect to participate in proposed subsequent operations.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 9, 1981, TXO Production Corporation, as operator, and Elmagene W. Dorsett (hereafter “Dorsett”), as a 4.05391%…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. ExxonMobil Corp. v. Valence Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
  2. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Valence Operating Co. v. Anadarko Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  4. Bonn Operating Co. v. DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION CO.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Matrix Production Co. v. Ricks Exploration, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API