Legal Opinion

Simmonds v. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1929No. 8234PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FL?, C. J.

This is a suit by Simmonds and Perry for the value of a gray mule, alleged to have died from injuries received while being transported from Fort Worth to Driscoll. On the answers of a jury to special issues submitted by the county judge, judgment was rendered that appellants take nothing- by their suit.

The jury found that the mule was delivei’ed in good condition to the carrier in Fort Worth and was delivered to appellants in like condition at Driscoll, the point of destination. There was testimony to sustain the answers of the jury. The-findings of the jury are not assailed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. ColeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. ColeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. RodockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Estep v. BrattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Simmonds v. St. Louis B. & M. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Tumlinson v. San Antonio Brewing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Fort Worth Well MacHinery & Supply Co. v. WaggomanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API