St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Cole
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.
It is insisted in plaintiff in error’s motion for rehearing that but one juror out of eight who testified on the hearing of the motion for a new trial gave testimony to support the finding implied by us to the trial court that the misconduct of the jury complained of did not occur. This statement is not supported by the record, as two jurors testified positively to such facts. In fact, we think a fair construction of the testimony heard ,on the motion for new trial shows that three jurors so testified.
We were in error in stating in the original opinion that one of the jurors who so testified…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Chicago, Rock Island & Gulf Railway Co. v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. HearksTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Fountain v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Chocolate Shop, Inc.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- State Teachers' Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. MimsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. WaldoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.