Legal Opinion
St. Louis, B. & M. Ry. Co. v. Cole
Texas Commission of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1929No. 1026-5205PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.
Defendants in error, the surviving wife and minor children of Charles A. Cole, were awarded a judgment against plaintiff in error for damages, based on findings of *1025(.lie jury in answer to special issues that said Cole’s death resulted from plaintiff in error’s negligence, in causing one of its locomotives to collide with the automobile in which Cole was riding at a point where a public road crossed one of its side tracks.
The principal question urged in this court is that a new trial should have been granted on account of the misconduct of the jury in considering the verdict rendered in this…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Bradley v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Baker v. ShafterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Hines v. ForemanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Monkey Grip Rubber Co. v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Fountain v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BankstonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Texas Indemnity Insurance v. StaggsTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Williams v. RodockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.