Legal Opinion

Reardon Office Equipment v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1987No. C0-87-183PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Approximately one year into lease payments on a contract to lease a copy machine, appellants realized they were being charged for more than they believed they had agreed to pay, so they returned the machine to respondent Reardon Office Equipment and made no further payments. Respondent served appellants with a summons and complaint seeking the balance due and owing for the copier on April 1, 1986. On April 28, 1986, without prior notice to appellants, respondent moved for and was granted a default judgment in Hennepin County District Court. Respondent proceeded to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Boulevard Del, Inc. v. StillmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Vrooman Floor Covering Inc. v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Valley View, Inc. v. SchutteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Jorissen v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  2. Riley on Behalf of Swanson v. HerbesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. WESTBROOKE PATIO HOMES ASS'N v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Lyon Financial Services, Inc. v. WaddillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API