Legal Opinion

Jorissen v. Miller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1987No. C3-86-37PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YETKA, Justice.

This is an appeal from the decision of the court of appeals affirming a trial court order which both denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment in a personal injury case and granted respondent’s motion to vacate an earlier conciliation court judgment against appellants. We affirm.

On September 23, 1982, a vehicle operated by respondent, Thomas Jorissen, collided with a vehicle driven by appellant, Barbara Miller, and owned by appellant, Susan Cranston. Both cars in the collision were damaged. In addition, respondent was injured.

Appellant Cranston brought an action in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mattsen v. PackmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Boulevard Del, Inc. v. StillmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Hammer v. SoderbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Jorissen v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. American Sharecom, Inc. v. LDB International Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Egge v. Healthspan Services Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  4. Kern v. JansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Reardon Office Equipment v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API