Legal Opinion

Boulevard Del, Inc. v. Stillman

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1984No. CX-83-1283PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order vacating a summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, after payment and satisfaction of the judgment. We reverse.

Facts

Plaintiff-appellant, Boulevard Del commenced an action against defendant-respondent, Stillman to recover $25,000 under a lease guarantee in January of 1983. Subsequently, Boulevard Del filed a motion for summary judgment. Between the commencement of the action and a hearing on the motion, defendant Stillman did not take depositions, nor obtain opposing affidavits, nor conduct any other discovery.

The only ‘evidence’ submitted to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Bartel v. New Haven TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Gaspord v. Washington County Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Dorso Trailer Sales, Inc. v. American Body & Trailer, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Herubin v. FinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Carter v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Hanson v. WoolstonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Jorissen v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API