Legal Opinion

State of Arkansas Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Harnage

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 20, 1995No. 95-528PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bradley D. Jesson, Chief Justice.

The appellant, Office of Child Support Enforcement (“Office”), appeals from a chancellor’s order dismissing its paternity complaint against appellee Mark Harnage. The chancellor ruled that the Office was not a “real party in interest” under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-14-210 (Repl. 1993), due to the fact that the Office had expended no public funds on behalf of the minor child, and thus had no standing to bring suit against Harnage. As the Office made a proper showing that it was a real party in interest under § 9-14-210(d)(2), we reverse and remand.

On July 18, 1994,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Mings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Nelson v. River Valley Bank & TrustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Torrey v. City of Fort SmithCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Griffin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & OrganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API