Legal Opinion
Irwin v. Goodno
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 28, 2004No. A04-751PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellant Raymond D. Irwin, who is indeterminately committed as mentally ill and dangerous and as a psychopathic personality, appeals from a decision by the judicial appeal panel. The appeal panel dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction his petition for rehearing and reconsideration of the order of the Commissioner of Human Services denying his petition for discharge from his commitment as mentally ill and dangerous. Because the appeal panel had subject-matter jurisdiction to address Irwin’s petition, we reverse and remand for a hearing and decision on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- In Re Senty-HaugenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re IrwinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re ThulinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. COUNTY OF LYONCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Citizens for Rule of Law v. Senate Committee on Rules & AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In the Matter of the CIVIL COMMITMENT OF: Brent Charles NIELSENCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re the Civil Commitment of BeaulieuCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.