Legal Opinion
In Re the Civil Commitment of Beaulieu
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 2007No. A07-496PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
The State of Minnesota argues that the district court erred when it determined that it lacks both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction to civilly commit respondent, an enrolled member of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, as a sexually dangerous person under Minn.Stat. § 253B.02, subd. 18(c) (2004). Because (1) there is an adequate connection between respondent and the state, (2) respondent received notice of the action, and (3) respondent was afforded an opportunity to be heard, we conclude that the state has personal jurisdiction over respondent. Furthermore,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re BlodgettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Civil Commitment of LonerganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- United States v. TomDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Morgan v. 2000 Volkswagen, License No. 279, Vin 3VWRA29M2YM125643Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008