Legal Opinion

Neil v. Allstate Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 1988No. 52PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this appeal is whether the “family exclusion” clause in appellants’ homeowners’ insurance policy is valid with the result that appellants will be without insurance coverage for the jury-determined liability of appellant/mother for injuries sustained by her minor son.

Appellants’ son, Adam Neil, was permanently injured when he was struck near his home by an automobile driven by Conrad Guenzel. Appellants brought a civil action against Guenzel for Adam’s injuries, and Guenzel subsequently joined appellants as additional defendants on the grounds of negligent supervision of Adam.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Mamlin v. GenoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Aetna Casualty & Surety InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. WeinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Millers Capital Insurance Co. v. Gambone Bros. Development Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Britamco Underwriters, Inc. v. GrzeskiewiczSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. St. Paul Mercury Insurance v. CorbettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Jeffrey v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API