Legal Opinion
Rockaway Park Series Corp. v. Hollis Automotive Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 1954PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGavagan, J.
This is a motion by the defendant for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The verified complaint seeks to foreclose a purchase-money mortgage taken on February 26, 1951, by A. Joseph and Cecile A. Greist who conveyed to the defendant four buildings described as premises 249-251-253-255 West 68th Street, New York City. The Greists subsequently assigned the mortgage to the plaintiff, a close corporation owned and operated by the said Greists. The sale of the property was subject to existing violations filed against the buildings. The mortgage contained a clause…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graf v. Hope Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Caspert v. Anderson Apartments, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bisno v. SaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Ciavarelli v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Brause v. 2968 Third Avenue Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Rockaway Park Series Corp. v. Hollis Automotive Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- 220 West 42 Associates v. Ronbet Newmark Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.