Jensen v. Jones
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION *
Chief Justice DURHAM, opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
1 1 This appeal involves a challenge to the state engineer's authority to declare forfeiture of a water right as the basis for denying a change application. We hold that the state engineer lacks authority to declare a water right forfeited in reviewing a change application. We reverse the district court's grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
T2 Marilyn Hamblin owned 1 Water Right No. 55-11041 as an alleged tenant in common. The water right provides for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Washington County Water Conservancy District v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Utah CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1951
- Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Whitmore v. Murray CityUtah Supreme Court · 1944
- Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haik v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Thatcher v. LangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. HaikCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Rocky Ford v. Kents LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Utah State Eng'r v. Johnson (In Re Utah Lake & Jordan River)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018