Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Jones

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2011No. 20090742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION *

Chief Justice DURHAM, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1 1 This appeal involves a challenge to the state engineer's authority to declare forfeiture of a water right as the basis for denying a change application. We hold that the state engineer lacks authority to declare a water right forfeited in reviewing a change application. We reverse the district court's grant of summary judgment and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

BACKGROUND

T2 Marilyn Hamblin owned 1 Water Right No. 55-11041 as an alleged tenant in common. The water right provides for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Washington County Water Conservancy District v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. United States v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Utah CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Little Cottonwood Water Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Whitmore v. Murray CityUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Eardley v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haik v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Thatcher v. LangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Salt Lake City Corp. v. HaikCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  4. Rocky Ford v. Kents LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Utah State Eng'r v. Johnson (In Re Utah Lake & Jordan River)Court of Appeals of Utah · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API