Legal Opinion

Haik v. Jones

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2018No. Case No. 20160878PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Associate Chief Justice Lee authored an opinion concurring in part and concurring in result in which Chief Justice Durrant joined.

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Mark Haik wants water for his undeveloped canyon lots. As part of an effort to obtain that water, Haik challenged a change application that sought to add acreage to accommodate a private water system that would serve ten homes in Little Cottonwood Canyon. The change application did not directly impact Haik's property or his water rights. Haik sought judicial review of the State Engineer's approval. The district court concluded Haik lacked standing to mount that challenge. The district court also rebuffed Haik's efforts to amend his petition…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Utah Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Utah Air Quality BoardUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Society of Professional Journalists v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McKitrick v. GibsonUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Bleazard v. City of ErdaUtah Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Christiansen v. Harrison WesternUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Southern Utah Wilderness v. San Juan CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. LopezUtah Supreme Court · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API