Legal Opinion

Easton Farmers Grain Co. v. Fernandes Grain Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 17, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr.. Justice Heard

delivered the opinion of the court.

Appellant brought suit against appellee under the statute to recover for losses alleged to have been sustained by reason of gambling, transactions in buying and selling grain. Appellee pleaded the general issue. Upon the trial, at the conclusion of the appellant’s evidence, the court directed a verdict for appellee, overruled appellant’s motion for a new trial and entered a judgment accordingly, from which judgment this appeal was taken.

It is contended by appellant that the court erred in directing a verdict for appellee. Upon the trial it…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Pardridge v. CutlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Pearce v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Jamieson v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Cothran v. EllisIllinois Supreme Court · 1888

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ehrlich v. RothschildAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  2. Riordon v. McCabeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API