Legal Opinion

Cothran v. Ellis

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1888PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District; —heard in that court on writ of error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Elliott Anthony, Judge, presiding. Mr. Francis A. Riddle, for the plaintiff in error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey

On the 23d day of June, 1885, the defendants in error, J. Alder Ellis and Milton C. Lightner, brought an action of assumpsit in the Superior Court of Cook county, against George W. Cothran, on the following instrument:

“$10,000. Chicago, January 24, 1882.
“Ninety days after date, I promise to pay to the order of Smith, McCormick & Co. $10,000 at their office, with interest from date until paid, at six per cent, value received.

George W. Cothran.”

—Which was indorsed in blank by the payees, without recourse. To the declaration, which is in the usual form, the defendant interposed the plea of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pearce v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Amory v. GilmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  3. Carrier v. BrannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Collamer v. DaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1829
  5. Wallace v. GooldIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Schneider v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Joliet, Aurora & Northern Railway Co. v. VelieIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Harvey v. MerrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. State ex rel. Hammond Elevator Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API