Ehrlich v. Rothschild
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett
Plaintiff sues to recover money alleged to have been lost to the defendants in a gambling transaction. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of defendants and entered judgment on the verdict. Subsequently the plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds, first, that pertain letters offered by plaintiff were erroneously excluded by the court, and second, that the court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict in favor of defendants. This motion for a new trial was granted, and this appeal was perfected by defendants pursuant to sec. 77 of the Civil…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Jamieson v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Pelouze v. SlaughterIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Tenney v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- R. E. Pratt & Co. v. AshmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salzman v. BoeingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
- Salzman v. BoeingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- State ex rel. Pace v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013