Legal Opinion

Ehrlich v. Rothschild

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1937No. Gen. No. 39,687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matchett

Plaintiff sues to recover money alleged to have been lost to the defendants in a gambling transaction. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of defendants and entered judgment on the verdict. Subsequently the plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds, first, that pertain letters offered by plaintiff were erroneously excluded by the court, and second, that the court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict in favor of defendants. This motion for a new trial was granted, and this appeal was perfected by defendants pursuant to sec. 77 of the Civil…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Jamieson v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Pelouze v. SlaughterIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Tenney v. FooteIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. R. E. Pratt & Co. v. AshmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salzman v. BoeingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
  2. Salzman v. BoeingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  3. State ex rel. Pace v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API