Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Mr. Tee's
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 6, 1994No. Civ. 93-1804 (CSF)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
CLARKSON S. FISHER, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure brought by defendants Mr. Tee’s, John Maddock and Janice Maddock. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
This action arises out of plaintiffs’ claim of copyright infringement and unfair competition relating to unique miniature golf course holes allegedly designed and built by plaintiffs David Wilson and Wilson Associates. Plaintiffs opened a miniature golf course featuring these…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Video Pipeline, Inc. v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Damiano v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Tingley Systems, Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Duffy v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.