Legal Opinion
Rehbock v. Reservoir Hill Gasoline Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 20, 1936No. Civ. No. 9883PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs, lessors under an oil and gas lease dated July 12, 1922, recovered from Rio Grande Oil Company, assignee of the original lessees, W. R. Ramsay and IT. T. Coffin, certain sums as royalties, which the trial court found to be due in addition to the royalties theretofore paid under the lease. Defendant Rio Grande, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, appeals.
The lease provided that “In the event that petroleum, oil, naphtha, natural gas, asphaltum or hydrocarbon, or other kindred or like substances are found in and produced from the demised premises, then the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Terry v. SicklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Hansen v. Fresno Jersey Farm Dairy Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perbal v. Dazor Manufacturing Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Withers v. MatthewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961