Legal Opinion
Perbal v. Dazor Manufacturing Corp.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided December 31, 1968No. 53029PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
By four counts of their petition plaintiffs, as owners of certain patents, sought royalties alleged to be due under licensing agreements on items or devices manufactured and sold by Dazor Manufacturing Corp. and its predecessors. In a fifth count plaintiffs sought to hold defendant Percy L. Read personally liable for the royalties. Judgment in excess of $559,000 was entered in favor of plaintiffs on Counts I, III and IV, and Dazor Manufacturing Corp. has appealed. Judgment was entered for defendants on Counts II and V, and plaintiffs have appealed.
Dazor Manufacturing…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Brulotte v. Thys Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Carter v. St. John's Regional Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Laclede Gas Company, Doing Business as Midwest Missouri Gas Company v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Stone v. WatersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- Public Communications Services, Inc. v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- W. A. Pipkin, W. O. Kinnebrew, Arthur S. Gibbons and the Exchange National Bank of Tampa, a National Banking Corporation, VCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.