Legal Opinion

Frick Co. v. Oats

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1908No. 1868, Okla. TPublishedCited by 21 opinions

Okla. T. EiTor from. District Court, Woods County; before J. L. Pan-coast, Judge. Action in replevin by the Frick Company against D. C. Oats and W. W. Parsons. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTuenbe, J.

This is an action of replevin brought by the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against defendants in error, defendants below, in the district court of Woods county, on October 22, 1901, to recover possession, among other things, of a traction engine, an Eclipse thresher, a wind stacker, a sawmill, etc., of the total value of $1,200. 0,n the same day an order of delivery was duly issued and plaintiffs placed in possession of the property, which he has since retained. It seems that on July 10, 1899, one Richard Pearson, being indebted to plaintiff in the sum of about $2,000, made, executed,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Hart v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  4. Hauselt v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Railroad v. HigginsTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Patterson v. RousneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Anderson v. Oklahoma Moline Plow Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  4. Ransom & Randolph Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Morgan v. Stanton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API