Legal Opinion

Corbett v. Littlefield

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1890PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover possession of two horses, known as “Tommy Linn” and “ Dan D.” The action is brought against the defendant, sheriff of Wavne county, who held them under three writs of attachment issued against the goods and chattels of Clifton E. Mayne. The cause was tried in the Wayne .circuit court before a jury, where the plaintiff had verdict and judgment for six cents’ damages, he having taken the property under the writ.

The plaintiff on the trial claimed to be entitled to the possession of the property by virtue of a chattel mortgage given by Clifton E. Mayne,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. SterrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Montgomery v. WightMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Shapard v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  4. People ex rel. Esper v. BurnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Snyder v. YatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API