Bradley v. McKee
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
At law. Assumpsit [by W. A. Bradley] against [Reddick McKee] the maker of the 'note mentioned in the preceding case, which was in this form: “Wheeling, March 22d, 1834. Sixty days after date, I promise to pay to the order of Richard Simmes, at the North-Western Bank of Virginia, $4,000, without defalcation, for value received. R. McKee, Agent Wheeling Cotton Manufacturing Company. $4,000.” Indorsed; “Richard Simmes, Knox & McKee, M. Nelson, W.' B. Atterbury.”
Read the full summary
At law. Assumpsit [by W. A. Bradley] against [Reddick McKee] the maker of the 'note mentioned in the preceding case, which was in this form: “Wheeling, March 22d, 1834. Sixty days after date, I promise to pay to the order of Richard Simmes, at the North-Western Bank of Virginia, $4,000, without defalcation, for value received. R. McKee, Agent Wheeling Cotton Manufacturing Company. $4,000.” Indorsed; “Richard Simmes, Knox & McKee, M. Nelson, W.' B. Atterbury.” Upon the trial, Mr. Brent, for the defendant, contended that he was the regularly appointed agent of the Wheeling Cotton Manufacturing…
1Opinion of the Court
Verdict for defendant. The plaintiff took bills of exception, but has not prosecuted a writ of error.
2Cited by18 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Planters' Bank v. SharpSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Donald & Co. v. HewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Abraham v. PlestoroCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1829
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.