Legal Opinion

Dean v. Barrett Homes, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 2010No. A-15 September Term 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

8 A.3d 766 (2010)

204 N.J. 286

Robert R. DEAN, Jennifer P. Dean and Mary Sue Dean, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BARRETT HOMES, INC., Lincoln Wood Products, Inc., Sto of New Jersey, Inc., Sto Eastern, Inc., Architectural Exterior Finishes, Inc., and HouseMaster, Inc., Defendants, and

Sto Corp., Defendant-Respondent.

A-15 September Term 2009.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 5, 2010.

Decided November 15, 2010.

Peter L. Davidson argued the cause for appellants (The Davidson Legal Group, attorneys).

Andrew P. Fishkin argued the cause for respondent (Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge, attorneys; Mr.…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hoens; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  4. Casa Clara Condo. Ass'n v. Charley Toppino and Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API