Legal Opinion

Brundage v. Foye

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1995No. 9311SC620Published

1Opinion of the Court

454 S.E.2d 669 (1995)

118 N.C. App. 138

Flora S. BRUNDAGE and James A. Brundage, Plaintiffs,

v.

Robert L. FOYE and Wilma Foye, Defendants.

No. 9311SC620.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

March 7, 1995.

Hinton and Hewett by Alan B. Hewett, Smithfield, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Perry, Brown & Levin by Cedric R. Perry and Charles E. Craft, Wilson, for defendants-appellants.

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant Robert Foye (Robert) appeals the trial court's failure to set aside a consent judgment and the court's refusal to grant his attorney's motion to withdraw from the action. For the reasons set forth herein, we…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. King v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Gardiner v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API