Legal Opinion

Barham v. Scalia

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1996No. 95CA1789PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

Defendants, the Board of Trustees of the University of Northern Colorado (Board) and Vincent Scalia, appeal the trial court’s order denying, in part, their motion to dismiss the complaint of plaintiff, Jerry Barham, on the basis of sovereign immunity. Barham cross-appeals a part of the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

This action arises from the Board’s termination of Barham’s employment as a tenured professor at the University of Northern Colorado (UNC). Barham had been employed at UNC…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rugg v. McCartySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Regional Transportation District v. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. City of Lakewood v. BraceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Moody v. UngererSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  5. Uberoi v. University of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Castaldo v. StoneDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
  3. Negron v. GolderColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Fry v. LeeColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Steamboat Springs Rental & Leasing, Inc. v. City & County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2000

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API