Legal Opinion
Fry v. Lee
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA1575PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JUDGE LOEB
¶ 1 Plaintiff, -Michele Fry, appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her complaint, which alleged defamation and related claims against defendants, Kurtis Lee and The Denver Post, LLC (the Post), pursuant *846to C.R.C.P. 12(b)(5). We affirm and remand with directions.
I. Procedural History and Background
¶ 2 In 2011, Fry ran as a candidate for the District 5 seat on the Denver City Council. As part of her campaign, Fry responded to a questionnaire that the Downtown Denver Partnership (DDP) provided to the District 5 candidates. The candidates’ responses were made public.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Miller v. Bank of New York MellonColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Giduck v. NiblettColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- Makeen v. HaileyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.