Legal Opinion

Druckerman v. Harbord

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1940PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernstein, J.

The defendant Victor Talking Machine Company, appearing specially, seeks to vacate the service of the supplemental summons and to dismiss the second consolidated amended complaint on the ground that the court has not jurisdiction of the person of said defendant. It appears from the moving papers that the defendant, a New Jersey corporation having authority to do business in the State of New York, surrendered such authority by *1078a certificate of surrender filed in the office of the Secretary of State on August 18, 1930, and that the service of the supplemental summons was made on the Secretary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holmes v. CampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Frank v. CarlisleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brown v. TenneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Winkelman v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. Carruthers v. Jack Waite Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. Scalisi v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  5. Hirshhorn v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API