Legal Opinion
Frank v. Carlisle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
This court has previously adjudged the original complaint herein insufficient but modified an order dismissing the complaint on the merits by permitting plaintiff to replead. (Frank v. Carlisle, 254 App. Div. 652.) The amended complaint now before us has been held sufficient by Special Term. Certain of the defendants appeal.
Plaintiff, a stockholder of Niagara Hudson Power Corporation, seeks to allege causes of action against defendants for claimed breaches of duty as directors of two other predecessor corporations, Northeastern Power Corporation and Power Corporation of New York, and also…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Holmes v. CampAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- New York Trust Co. v. American Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Walsh v. Van Ameringen-Haebler, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Laue v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Druckerman v. HarbordNew York Supreme Court · 1940