Legal Opinion

Rivers v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from tbe Criminal Court of Hamilton County. — S. D. McReynolds, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

delivered tbe opinion of tbe Court.

Defendant is convicted of voluntary manslaughter for the killing of Prof. Caruthers, and sentenced to three years in tbe State penitentiary; and be has appealed. He assigned no errors upon tbe merits of the case; and there is no contention that be is not guilty of tbe offense *237of which he is convicted. There are two assignments of error, and only two, insisted npon, either in the assignment or in the argument at the bar.

The first is that the court erred in striking out the defendant’s plea in abatement to the indictment; and the second is that the court erred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Carter v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Smith v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Ransom v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Wilson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chairs v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Dietzel v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pennel v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Holiday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
  5. Holiday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API