Legal Opinion

Pennel v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1909PublishedCited by 10 opinions

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Criminal Court of Davidson County. — W. M'. Hart, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

This cause is before us on appeal, and the only error assigned is to the action of the trial judge in overruling the defendant’s plea in abatement to the indictment upon which he was convicted. This plea is as follows, viz.:

*624“State of Tennessee v. Jim Pennel.
“Comes the defendant, Jim Pennel, in proper person, and for plea to the indictment filed in this case says it is invalid and void for the following reasons:
“(1) That the thirteen members constituting the grand jury that found and returned the indictment in. this case were appointed by the judge of the criminal court of Davidson county and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Crowley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Smartt and Carson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ransom v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ShermanTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ashby v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Chairs v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Dietzel v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API