Feeney v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

An indictment was preferred against appellant containing eight counts charging forgery and passing a forged instrument. It is unnecessary to discuss any of them except the seventh. It was upon this count the conviction was predicated and the verdict of the jury returned.

The seventh count charged appellant with passing as true the following instrument which purported to he the act of another, to wit: “R. C. Cameron & Son per R. C. 0. Prest. & Treas. and was of the tenor following, to wit: ‘Waco, Texas, July 31, 1908, No. 614. The Provident Rational Bank of Waco,…