Legal Opinion

Jennings v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1921No. 6101PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of attempting to pass a forged instrument, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The case is brought before us for review on only one question we can consider: the validity of the second count in the indictment under which the conviction was had. Omitting the portions not necessary to this issue, the second count is as follows: “And the grand jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid, do present that . . . George Jennings, did then and there unlawfully attempt to pass as true to Omer Rider a forged instrument in writing to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Sherwood v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Hammons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
  5. Lomax v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Verner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. De Santiego v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Burck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API