Jennings v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of attempting to pass a forged instrument, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.
The case is brought before us for review on only one question we can consider: the validity of the second count in the indictment under which the conviction was had. Omitting the portions not necessary to this issue, the second count is as follows: “And the grand jurors aforesaid upon their oaths aforesaid, do present that . . . George Jennings, did then and there unlawfully attempt to pass as true to Omer Rider a forged instrument in writing to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henderson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
- Sherwood v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Hammons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
- Lomax v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Verner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Middleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
- De Santiego v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Burck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.