Legal Opinion

Shipman v. Fulcrod

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874PublishedCited by 16 opinions

■ Appeal from Goliad. Tried below before the Hon. D. D. Claiborne.

1Opinion of the CourtReeves, J.

The note declared on by the plaintiff as his cause of action in his petition, is described as a note executed by S. W. Walker and E. M. Shipman. The note is set out in the petition in Jubo verba.

The note produced on the trial, and read as evidence, was signed by S. P. Walker and E. M. Shipman, as makers.

On the trial, the defendant and appellant, Shipman, objected to the introduction of the last-mentioned note in evidence:

First. Because it did not have a revenue stamp upon it; and

Second. Because it was not the note sued upon and described in the petition, and stating, in a bill of exception…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  2. Gammage v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Mims v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Mays v. RutledgeTexas Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wiebusch v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hess v. SchaffnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Watson v. MirikeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  4. McAlister v. BivingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Wood v. IngramCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API