Legal Opinion

Hurd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1925No. 8614PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Kaufman, county of forgery, and his punishment fixed at two years in the penitentiary.

We do not think this case one of circumstantial evidence. Mr. Yates swore that appellant admitted to him that he signed the alleged forged check, and that' he claimed his name was Odis Rhodes. We think the complaint that the court did not charge on alibi is not sustained by the record. That theory was submitted in the charge.

Appellant excepted to the court’s charge because it did not instruct the jury to return a verdict of not guilty because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fischl v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Feeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
  2. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. McKellar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API