Legal Opinion

Strasburger v. Rosenheim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

On April 26, 1927, appellants and Monroe Luchs wrote to plaintiff that they were the owners of ninety-seven per cent of the common stock of the Best-Ever Slipper Company and “ To induce you to make the purchase of the fifty shares of our preferred stock, we want to say that we will see to it that the company abides by the conditions outlined as follows:

“1. The company will repurchase your stock at par on or before the 1st day of February 1931.
“ 2. No dividends will be paid on the common stock of the company during any of the time that you are a stockholder until a reserve each year of at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Topken, Loring & Schwartz, Inc. v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Wooster v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hanrog Distributing Corp. v. HaniotiNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Weis v. OffenbergerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
  3. Sweinhart v. BambergerNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Leumi Financial Corp. v. RichterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Ball v. United Artists Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API