Ball v. United Artists Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtEager, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from an order entered December 28, 1960, denying in all respects their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and for vacatur of notices of examination served by plaintiffs.
The action is at law to recover money damages for alleged wrongful use by defendants of the title “ China Doll” as the title of a motion picture released, distributed and shown by them. There are two alleged causes of action, namely, the first, to recover for the alleged wrongful acts of defendant in having “unlawfully appropriated to their own use and pirated the said property…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- DuPont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Underhill v. . SchenckNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Tiffany & Co. v. Tiffany Productions, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bio-Technology General Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. First American Fund of Funds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- National Color Laboratories, Inc. v. Philip's Foto Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Thomson Industries, Inc. v. Nippon Thompson Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Gordon v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.