Legal Opinion
Hanrog Distributing Corp. v. Hanioti
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1945PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBernard L. Shientag, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment. The complaint is predicated on a written agreement of guarantee entered into between the parties. The answer consists of a general denial and four separate defenses alleging, generally, fraud and duress in the execution of the writing upon which the complaint is based. The answering affidavit of the defendant fails, however, to set forth facts within the meaning' of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice sustaining the formal defenses contained in the answer. The papers show without contradiction that the defendant was at all times represented by an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Dwan v. MassareneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Strasburger v. RosenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by32 opinions
- S. J. Capelin Associates, Inc. v. Globe Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Di Sabato v. SoffesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Fender v. PrescottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Acevedo v. Audubon Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.