Legal Opinion
Garcia v. Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1988No. 16667PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Plaintiffs brought this action against defendant attorneys and their law firm which had successfully opposed plaintiff Garcia in a previous federal civil rights lawsuit. In the prior action Garcia sued the members of the Board of Education of the Socorro Consolidated School District under 42 U.S. C. Section 1983 (1982) alleging that the board had violated his civil rights by failing to renew his contract of employment. The school board members were represented by defendants.
Garcia in that case sued the school board members in both their individual and official…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Nelson v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Drago v. BuonagurioNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling InterestsTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Hovet v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Enron Corp. Securities, Derivative & ERISA Lit.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2002
- L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Wilschinsky Ex Rel. Wilschinsky v. MedinaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.