Legal Opinion

McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling Interests

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1999No. 97-0970PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hankinson

In this case, we determine whether McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler, a law firm representing Victoria Savings Association (VSA), may be liable to F.E. Ap-pling Interests, a general partnership, and Boca Chica Development Company, a joint venture partnership managed by Appling, both nonclients, for the tort of negligent misrepresentation, as defined by the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 552 (1977). At trial, McCamish, Martin moved for summary judgment on Appling’s negligent misrepresentation claim on the sole ground that, absent privity, McCamish, Martin owed no duty to Appling. The trial…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of Tyler v. SloaneTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  3. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Abell v. Potomac Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Smith International, Inc. v. Egle Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. Cantey Hanger, Llp v. Philip Gregory Byrd, Lucy Leasing Co., L.L.C., and Pgb Air, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Lesikar v. Rappeport, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  5. Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income FundTexas Supreme Court · 2010

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API