Legal Opinion
Daniel J. Monaco and Denise E. Monaco v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1981No. 79-4787PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NELSON, Circuit Judge:
The appellants, Daniel J. Monaco and Denise E. Monaco [hereinafter “Daniel” and “Denise,” respectively, or “the Monacos”], appeal from an order of the district court granting the motion of the United States to dismiss claims brought against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act [FTCA], 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671-2680 (1976 & Supp.1979). The district court concluded that an exception to the FTCA for claims incident to military service barred the Monaco’s claims and accordingly dismissed all claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
FACTS
During World War II,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Aaron Schwarder Donna Eubanks Kathleen Schwarder v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Freddie L. Johnson and Clara Johnson, Husband and Wife, and Cross v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee v. Timothy B. Hay, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Laswell v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Floyd A. Wright v. United States of America, and Nathan Fletcher, Malcolm S. Segal and Does I Through XxiiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re United States of America, in Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.