Legal Opinion

In Re Oszajca

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit

Decided April 9, 1997No. BAP No. 96-50006, Bankruptcy No. 95-10300 (FGC), Adv. No. 95-1079PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

207 B.R. 41 (1997)

In re Beverly OSZAJCA, Debtor.

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO., Appellant,

v.

Beverly OSZAJCA, Appellee.

BAP No. 96-50006, Bankruptcy No. 95-10300 (FGC), Adv. No. 95-1079.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit.

Argued and Submitted February 21, 1997.

Decided April 9, 1997.

Before: LIFLAND, GALLET and BUCKI, Bankruptcy Judges.

OPINION

LIFLAND, Chief Judge:

Sears, Roebuck & Co. ("Sears") appeals from an order of the bankruptcy court finding that, under Vermont law, the retention of a purchase money security interest in connection with a retail charge agreement is prohibited.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Keyes v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  2. In Re BellamyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re NorrellDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1977
  4. Matter of WiegertUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1991
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Valenti (In re Valenti)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Victory Markets, Inc.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re KampsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1998
  3. In Re MunzbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 2008
  4. In Re CarlosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1997
  5. In Re BeckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API