Legal Opinion

Burrows Equipment Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 16, 1969No. C.D. 3848PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The issue in these four consolidated cases concerns the proper tariff classification of certain articles known as “vitascopes” which were imported from Denmark and West Germany via Chicago. The 'articles were classified by the collector of customs under item 711.88 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (19 U.S.C. § 1202) as other instruments or apparatus for chemical analysis, and assessed with duty at 22 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff’s claim is that the vitascopes are properly classifiable under item 688.40 of the tariff schedules as electrical articles not specially…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Post v. BolesDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1963
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Jarrell-Ash Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Pukel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. People v. MorrisNassau County District Court · 1970
  3. John H. Faunce, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. American Scientific Products, Div. of American Hospital Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
  5. Kimball Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API