Legal Opinion

Maumee v. Weisner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1999No. 1998-2016PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 87 Ohio St.3d 295.] CITY OF MAUMEE, APPELLANT, v. WEISNER, APPELLEE. [Cite as Maumee v. Weisner,

1999-Ohio-68.] Criminal law—Police officer makes an investigative stop of an automobile, relying solely upon a dispatch—State must demonstrate at suppression hearing that facts precipitating the dispatch justified a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity—Telephone tip can, by itself, create reasonable suspicion justifying an investigative stop, when. 1. Where an officer making an investigative stop relies solely upon a dispatch, the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. Cochran, Ca2006-10-023 (7-2-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. Tidwell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Enyart v. ColemanDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API