Legal Opinion

Tourville v. Kowarsch

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1985No. C7-84-1512PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant brought an action against respondent to recover his alleged equitable interest in property in which respondent held title, and where the parties had formerly cohabited. After a trial to the court, the district court found that appellant failed to prove any interest in the property, and appellant brought this appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

The marriage of respondent Beverly Ko-warsch and her husband was dissolved in July, 1980. Respondent received the home, but needed to obtain a mortgage in order to satisfy her former husband’s interest in the property. Appellant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of EriksenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Anderson v. DeLisleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Hollom v. CareyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Hilton v. NelsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mechura v. McQuillanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Obert v. DahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Roatch v. PueraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. In Re Estate of PalmenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Moore v. SordahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API