Legal Opinion
Stratagene v. Invitrogen Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 7, 2002No. Civ.A.DKC 2001-3566PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHASANOW, District Judge.
Presently pending and ready for resolution in this patent infringement case are (1) the motion of Plaintiff Stratagene to disqualify Defendant Invitrogen Corporation’s attorney Vanessa B. Pierce (“Pierce”) and her law firm, Parsons, Behle & Latimer, LLP (“Parsons”) as Defendant’s counsel in the instant action; (2) the motion of Invitrogen Corporation (“In-vitrogen”) for leave to file five original declarations; and (3) the motion of Strata-gene for leave to file an original declaration. The issues have been fully briefed and no hearing is deemed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
- United States v. Robert Barnwell ClarksonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Tessier v. Plastic Surgery Specialists, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
- Buckley v. Airshield Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Rogers v. Pittston Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stratagene v. Parsons Behle & LatimerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Gross v. SES Americom, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Victors v. KronmillerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Healthnet, Inc. v. Health Net, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
- Nichols Agency, Inc. v. Enchanted Child Care, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.