Legal Opinion

State v. Burns

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 22, 1991No. 88-07-1542-C3; CA A62161; 88-07-1542-C2; CA A62298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

After a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendants were convicted of manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). They claim that the court erred in denying their motions to suppress and motions to controvert.

The facts of this case are set out in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 107 Or App 343, 812 P2d 832 (1991), and the law and the result are the same.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Morrison/BarteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Morrison/BarteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991