Legal Opinion

State v. Burns

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 11, 1991No. 88-07-1542-C3; CA A62161; 88-07-1542-C2; CA A62298Published

1Per curiam

Defendants have petitioned for review of our decision. 107 Or App 380, 812 P2d 837 (1991).1 We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it. For reasons explained in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 108 Or App 766, 816 P2d 1217 (1991), we modify our decision, vacate defendants’ convictions and remand for further proceedings as directed in State v. Morrison/Bartee, supra.

Petition for reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; convictions vacated; remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

In our per curiam opinion, we said:

“The facts of this case are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Morrison/BarteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API