Legal Opinion
Murray-Ohio Mfg. Co. v. E. C. Brown Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1942No. 8762PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
G. E. Bullock of the plaintiff-appellee company, designed a. velocipede. The patent office, upon his May 1, 1934, application, gave him patent No. 1,984,916, on December 18, 1934, for a “velocipede frame construction.” The District Court, in an infringement proceeding, held all of its claims in suit, to wit: 8, 12, 14, 17, 18 and 24, valid and infringed by three structures made and sold by the appellant. This appeal followed.
The history of the alleged invention, as narrated in brief and argument of the appellee, discloses that Bullock set out to modernize the design of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Buono v. Yankee Maid Dress CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lempco Products, Inc. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Powerlite Switchboard Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- De Cew v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
- Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1949
- Hamilton Mfg. Corp. v. Toledo Guild Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.