Legal Opinion
Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 23, 1949No. Civ. No. 8649PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAH, District Judge.
In the present action the plaintiffs assert that the plaintiff William J. Dubil is the inventor of the Method of Preparing Fresh Meat covered in the patent in suit, and that the plaintiffs Edward J. Hubik and Earl F. Shores are now the owners thereof. That the plaintiff Earl F. Shores, a resident of Los Angeles County, State of California, doing business under the fictitious firm name of “Chip Steak Company” of Los Angeles, California, has the exclusive right to practice the method covered by the patent, throughout the County of Los Angeles, except the cities of Long…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Magnus Harmonica Corp. v. Lapin Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953